aesthetic apeal has nothing to do with a good fly Marc. Besides the Royal wulff is beautiful which is a very hard thing for me to admit for a floating fly…:) better than that is only my own very secret variant/cross breed !
yep. we are no better than some fly anglers 200+years ago. we only have a bit more convenient, lighter rods, stronger fishing lines and the most important stuff of all other – plenty of tungstone…
fantastic
aesthetic apeal has nothing to do with a good fly Marc. Besides the Royal wulff is beautiful which is a very hard thing for me to admit for a floating fly…:) better than that is only my own very secret variant/cross breed !
absolute rubbish ! aesthetic appeal is EVERYTHING !!!
110% nonsens!!! beauty flies are poor fish catchers!!!
and you wrote above that the Wulff was beautiful….
the rule has its exceptions! and my uglier variant is even better!
must be like Paul’s Royal FuckUp i guess !
let’s see what it looks like, huh ?
the ‘concept’ is, it mostly prevents one from having to acquire any tying skills…
ha, i was under impresion that the concept is the same as the good 200 years old knowledge that the scruffy flies catch more fush…
ahhhh, that kind of attitude keeps people from reinventing the wheel everyday…
yep. we are no better than some fly anglers 200+years ago. we only have a bit more convenient, lighter rods, stronger fishing lines and the most important stuff of all other – plenty of tungstone…
we’re sexier too !
how could i forget it !